Le sociologue et la sociologie dans l’administration publique et l’exercice du pouvoir politique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le sociologue n'est pas encore très familier avec la participation à l'administration publique. Après les brillants travaux de Tocqueville et Weber, les sociologues contemporains ont tardé à étudier les bureaucraties publiques. Ils entrent actuellement dans ce champ d'étude, mais d'une manière encore incohérente et fragmentaire. Si l'étude de la bureaucratie publique leur pose peu de défis intellectuels, la participation à la vie interne de la fonction publique leur en pose de plus sérieux. Mais c'est surtout la participation à l'exercice du pouvoir politique qui trouve le sociologue démuni. Le pouvoir s'exerce par l'intermédiaire d'une pratique normative pour laquelle le sociologue est peu préparé. Il lui manque en particulier une grille d'analyse systématique et critique du droit, pour ne pas se retrouver sans défense à la remorque des juristes et des autres administrateurs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.032 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".