BLIND SOURCE SEPARATION ALGORITHM FOR MIMO CONVOLUTIVE MIXTURES
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider the problem of blind source separation of MIMO convolutive mixtures for the general case where the number of sensors are greater than or equal to the number of sources. We assume that sources are non-stationary signals. The separation is performed in the frequency domain by joint minimization of the o#--diagonal elements of observed signal's cross-spectral density matrices over di#erent epochs. We propose an e#cient Newton-- based algorithm over the complex Steifel manifold to minimize an appropriate cost function. We resolve the permutation problem using a novel tree structured diadic detection scheme. We find and correct wrong permutations at each frequency bin based on cross frequency correlation between diagonal elements of the output cross spectral matrices. We demonstrate the performance of the new algorithm using synthetic mixtures and real word recordings. The method has the additional advantage of fast convergence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it