MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1585401989 · doi:10.1234/ct.v22i3.690

AJIBA: UNA VARIEDAD DE PAPA (Solanum tuberosum L.) PARA LA AGRICULTURA CUBANA

2001· article· es· W1585401989 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ana Estévez, María E. González, Marlene Cordero, J. L. Salomón, Juan Guillermo Cruz-Castillo

Bibliographic record

VenueCultivos Tropicales · 2001
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPotato Plant Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolanum tuberosumCultivarBiologyHorticultureGeographyYield (engineering)New VarietyHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At present, the potato varieties used for production are coming from The Netherlands and Canada; therefore, different cultivars are annually introduced to be evaluated along the potato-growing areas of the country, selecting those showing the best adaptability, yield and disease resistance, with the aim of increasing the varietal structure of Cuban potato production. The objective of this research work was to evaluate and select some foreign potato varieties and as a result of it, the Dutch cultivar Ajiba was chosen for its shallow eyes, yellow skin, early maturity, roundish oval tubers, light yellow flesh, mean yields of 33.9 t.ha -1 , adequate field performance against PLRV and A. solani, showing stable yields over the three experimental years as well as when extended to the provinces of Havana, Matanzas, Ciego de Avila, Camaguey and Cienfuegos. Within 1998-1999, 1999-2000 and 2000-2001 seasons, this variety achieved excellent results with national yields of 29.2, 32.78 and 31.74 t.ha -1 , respectively, compared to Desiree (28.3, 24.57 and 22.95 t.ha -1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.122

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCultivos TropicalesSame topicPotato Plant ResearchFrench-language works237,207