MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W158543158

Estimation of ice thickness on large lakes from passive microwave and radar altimeter data

2010· article· en· W158543158 on OpenAlexaff
Claude Duguay, Kyung-Kuk Kang, Alexei Kouraev, Franck Mercier

Bibliographic record

VenueEGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadar altimeterSea ice thicknessGeologySea ice concentrationAltimeterMicrowaveSea iceSatelliteRemote sensingRadiometerRadarIce streamArctic ice packClimatologyBrightness temperatureMicrowave radiometerSea ice growth processesCryosphereAtmospheric sciencesEnvironmental science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lake ice grows steadily between the end of freeze-up period and the onset of break-up period as a result of the thermodynamics of freezing water as well as dynamic ice motion on the surface. In thermodynamic thickening, the conductive heat flow controls the ice growth rate and the ice thickness, and the ice thickens downward as a result of heat loss at the top of the ice cover. There has been some demonstration of the potential of brightness temperature from passive microwave airborne radiometers to estimate ice thickness. The value of passive microwave and radar altimeter data from current satellite missions merits to be examined in this respect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts→Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→