ESPAÇOS ENTRECRUZADOS, AGENTES CULTURAIS: O EXEMPLO DAS REVISTAS ALTERNATIVAS URBANAS.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inspirando-me em Walter Moser (2004), quando ele propõe que, no contexto histórico contemporâneo, “um agente transfere um objeto cultural de um sistema a outro”, estudo aquilo que se pode chamar um outro tipo de enunciação pedestre (cf. De Certeau, 1994): o trânsito de agentes culturais em suas relações com os segmentos da população que fazem da rua sua casa. Analiso para isso um tipo de revista feita para ser vendida pela população de rua nas grandes cidades. Neste trabalho, concentro-me nas revistas Ocas, em São Paulo e Rio de Janeiro, em diálogo com L’itinéraire, em Montréal, a despeito das diferenças econômicas e sociais entre os dois países em questão. A análise dos textos é feita a partir da relação entre três elementos: o espaço físico e simbólico das cidades e das revistas, os agentes mediadores culturais presentes no processo de produção e recepção dessas publicações e o trânsito desses agentes por esses espaços. Abstract: This study is inspired by Walter Moser (2004), when he proposes that, in the contemporary historical context, “an agent transfers a cultural object from one system to another”, which can be called another type of pedestrian enunciation (cf. De Certeau, 1994): the transit of cultural agents in their relations with segments of the population living in the streets. For such, a kind of magazine sold by street vendors in big cities is analysed. The focus here is on magazines Ocas, in São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, in a dialogue with L’itinéraire, in Montréal, regardless of economic and social differences between the two countries. The text analysis is carried out with basis on the relation between three elements: the physical and symbolic space of the cities and magazines, the cultural mediator agents taking part in the production and reception of those publications, and the agents’ transit through those spaces.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".