MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1585477425

In search of gentle death: the fight for your right to die with dignity Côté, Richard N. Mt. Pleasant: Corinthian Books, 2012. 465p.

2012· article· en· W1585477425 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jaime Escobar Triana

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Colombiana de Bioética · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEthics and bioethics in healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDignityHumanitiesArtPolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

* Medico cirujano, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Cirugia y enfermedades del colon, St. Mark s Hospital, Londres. Magister en Filosofia, Universidad Javeriana. Magister en Bioetica, Universidad de Chile, OPS. Ph.D en Bioetica, Universidad El Bosque. Director de los Programas de Especializacion, Maestria y Doctorado en Bioetica, Universidad El Bosque. Correo electronico: doctoradobioetica@unbosque.edu.co El libro “In search of gentle death: the fight for your right to die with dignity” del politologo y periodista Richard N. Cote es producto de un ingente trabajo, el cual logra consolidar con aportes de un colectivo de intelectuales y academicos de 14 paises (Belgica, Canada, Colombia, Inglaterra, Francia, Suiza y otros).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score0.586

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Colombiana de BioéticaSame topicEthics and bioethics in healthcareFrench-language works237,207