Dessaisissements et acquisitions d'usines dans le secteur canadien de la fabrication
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le présent document examine les caractéristiques des usines du secteur de la fabrication qui connaissent des changements de propriété, afin de mieux comprendre les causes sous-jacentes des fusions et des acquisitions. Des études canadiennes antérieures (Baldwin, 1995; Baldwin et Caves, 1991) comparent le rendement d'usines fusionnées, au début et à la fin des années 1970. Le présent document examine les variations annuelles qui se sont produites au cours des années 1970, 1980 et 1990, afin de fournir une perspective à plus long terme. Ce faisant, il fait état de la somme des changements qui se sont produits (tant du point de vue du nombre d'usines touchées que de la part de l'emploi), ainsi que des caractéristiques des usines qui ont mené à une prise de contrôle. Il examine en outre les différences entre les prises de contrôle canadiennes et étrangères.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".