La Constitution de Place-Royale en lieu symbolique : entre construction identitaire et promotion touristique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le phénomène du tourisme culturel, qui se traduit entre autres par un engouement des visiteurs pour le patrimoine, conduit les destinations touristiques telles que Québec à faire de la mise en valeur de leurs sites patrimoniaux un objectif majeur de leur politique touristique. C’est dans ce contexte que nous nous proposons d’étudier la restauration de Place-Royale et sa mise en tourisme. Si, à la fin des années 1960, la régénération du site et son édification en lieu symbolique répondent à des enjeux politiques et identitaires, c’est plutôt son potentiel d’attraction touristique qui prévaut à l’heure actuelle. Par l’analyse du discours de guides touristiques et de l’impact de la restauration du site dans son appréhension par les touristes, nous montrons comment Place-Royale est devenue un instrument de marketing substantiel au sein de la stratégie promotionnelle de la ville de Québec.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.029 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".