Dynamiques d’encampement : comparaison entre un camp formel et un camp informel en Haïti
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article compare deux camps limitrophes qui ont émergé après le séisme haïtien de 2010 : Corail, camp formel aidé par le dispositif humanitaire, et Canaan, camp informel. Après avoir exposé le cadre général de la précarité quotidienne, l’article relate l’histoire de Corail et comment, malgré l’aide humanitaire, ses habitants s’y sont révoltés. Puis, l’informalité incontrôlée de Canaan, qui est délaissé par les ONG et l’État haïtien, est présentée. L’ensemble interroge la notion de communauté, parfois imposée par le processus de mise en camp (et dysfonctionnant), parfois lien social permettant aux personnes de se projeter dans un temps allant au-delà du temporaire : celui de l’encampement comme lieu de vie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".