MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Factibilidad economico ambiental para el cultivo sostenible de ostion de mangle Crassostrea rhizophorae (Guilding, 1828), en Cuba

2014· article· es· W1585865530 on OpenAlexaff
Abel Betanzos Vega, Sarah Rivero Suarez, Jose Mazon Suastegui

Bibliographic record

VenueLatin American Journal of Aquatic Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Zones and Regional Development
Canadian institutionsCanadian Bank Note Company (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOysterAquacultureFisheryMangroveMangrove ecosystemAgricultureProfit (economics)Net profitGeographyEcosystemEcologyBiologyEconomicsFish <Actinopterygii>Archaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We analyzed two variants in producing mangrove oyster Crassostrea rhizophorae in Cuba: 1) traditional fishery (EP) at natural beds partially supported by aggregating suspended collectors in the mangrove, and 2) artisanal farming (CA) totally supported by spat from the wild, settled in artificial collectors and "mother shell" strings, farming and harvesting on the same artifact and oyster boxes. We determined the economic and environmental feasibility of both variants projected to a five year period from cost-benefit analysis based on production data. Tax on total income established in Cuba was included, as well as estimated costs for environmental damage. Traditional fishery (EP) presents negative net profit in a five years period (with return value US$-1388.39 at fifth year), as well as being environmentally costly by the negative impact on the mangrove ecosystem. Artisanal farming (CA) provides positive return from the third year and positive net profit (US$731.78 at fifth year), reducing environmental damage to mangrove ecosystem and allowing a substantial increase in oyster production. We recommend actions to achieve aquaculture and sustainable management of the native oyster C. rhizophorae in Cuba.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.442
Threshold uncertainty score0.879

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLatin American Journal of Aquatic ResearchSame topicEconomic Zones and Regional DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207