MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Far-IR excitations in Cd<sub>2</sub>Re<sub>2</sub>O<sub>7</sub>in the normal and superconducting states

2012· article· en· W1586280955 on OpenAlexafffund
Mojtaba Hajialamdari, F. S. Razavi, D. A. Crandles, R. K. Kremer, M. Reedyk

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Condensed Matter · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics
Canadian institutionsBrock University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSuperconductivityPhononCondensed matter physicsOptical conductivityPyrochloreInfraredThermal conductivitySpectral lineReflectivityAbsorption spectroscopySofteningMaterials sciencePhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cd(2)Re(2)O(7) is a pyrochlore superconductor with a transition temperature T(c) near 1 K. We report on the far-infrared optical properties of Cd(2)Re(2)O(7) at temperatures above and below T(c) with a particular emphasis on changes in the spectrum below T(c). Seventeen phonon modes are observed in the normal state optical conductivity spectrum of Cd(2)Re(2)O(7) at low temperatures in good agreement with a factor group analysis. In the superconducting state, a softening (~1 cm(-1)) of the phonon modes at 35 and 61 cm(-1) occurs and thermal reflectance spectra show the development of two additional strong absorption features, near 9.6 and 19.3 cm(-1). The dominant presence of lattice vibrational modes in the optical spectrum suggests that electron-phonon interaction plays an important role in the normal and superconducting state properties of Cd(2)Re(2)O(7).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Condensed MatterSame topicAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsFrench-language works237,207