MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1586371368 · doi:10.1002/iub.1272

The many functions of the endoplasmic reticulum chaperones and folding enzymes

2014· review· en· W1586371368 on OpenAlexafffund
L. Halperin, Joanna Jung, Marek Michalak

Bibliographic record

VenueIUBMB Life · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsEndoplasmic reticulumCo-chaperoneProtein foldingChaperone (clinical)Cell biologyUnfolded protein responseFolding (DSP implementation)EnzymeMembrane proteinCalnexinChemical chaperoneNative stateCellChemistryBiologyBiochemistryMembraneHeat shock proteinHsp90MedicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is an essential sub-cellular compartment of the eukaryotic cell performing many diverse functions essential for the cell and the whole organism. ER molecular chaperones and folding enzymes are multidomain proteins that are designed to support nascent proteins entering ER lumen to achieve their native conformation, mediate post-translational modification, prevent misfolded protein aggregation, and facilitate exit from the ER. Typically the role of ER chaperones expands beyond protein folding. Here, we illustrate the multifunctional nature of many ER associated molecular chaperones and folding enzymes and unique functional overlap of these proteins all designed to support the many functions of the ER membrane.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations111
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIUBMB LifeSame topicEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207