Measurement of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mtext mathvariant="normal">−</mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math>Mixing Parameters Using<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mi>π</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>π</mml:mi><mml:mo>−</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math>and<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>−</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math>Decays
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report a direct measurement of ${D}^{0}\mathrm{\text{\ensuremath{-}}}{\overline{D}}^{0}$ mixing parameters through a time-dependent amplitude analysis of the Dalitz plots of ${D}^{0}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{K}_{S}^{0}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{+}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ and, for the first time, ${D}^{0}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{K}_{S}^{0}{K}^{+}{K}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ decays. The low-momentum pion ${\ensuremath{\pi}}_{s}^{+}$ in the decay ${D}^{*+}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{D}^{0}{\ensuremath{\pi}}_{s}^{+}$ identifies the flavor of the neutral $D$ meson at its production. Using $468.5\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{fb}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ of ${e}^{+}{e}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ colliding-beam data recorded near $\sqrt{s}=10.6\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{GeV}$ by the BABAR detector at the PEP-II asymmetric-energy collider at SLAC, we measure the mixing parameters $x=[1.6\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}2.3(\mathrm{stat})\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1.2(\mathrm{syst})\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.8(\mathrm{model})]\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}3}$, and $y=[5.7\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}2.0(\mathrm{stat})\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}1.3(\mathrm{syst})\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.7(\mathrm{model})]\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}3}$. These results provide the best measurement to date of $x$ and $y$. The knowledge of the value of $x$, in particular, is crucial for understanding the origin of mixing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.011 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.020 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.014 |
| Open science | 0.021 | 0.020 |
| Research integrity | 0.018 | 0.019 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.199 | 0.018 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".