MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

New Reflection on Undergraduate Teaching System Construction of Landscape in Art Colleges

2013· article· en· W1586424667 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yuan Feng, Peng Yan-ping

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIdeological and Political Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPromulgationBachelorArchitectureLandscape architectureLandscape designThe artsReflection (computer programming)Foundation (evidence)SociologyEngineering ethicsEngineeringArchitectural engineeringPolitical scienceCivil engineeringVisual artsComputer scienceArtLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By the end of 2012, the undergraduate course catalog in colleges and universities has expressly stipulated that landscape architecture majors can be granted Bachelor of Arts. The promulgation of this provision not only laid the academic foundation of landscape profession (landscape architecture) but pointed out the future direction of landscape architecture for art colleges. According to the unique academic characteristics of art colleges, the authors in this paper put forward three suggestions on constructing undergraduate teaching of landscape architecture in art colleges, in hope that people with lofty ideals would pay more attention to exploring the construction of characteristic landscape architecture for art colleges under the new situation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.012
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicIdeological and Political EducationFrench-language works237,207