La quête du : rumeurs, réussite et malheur en République démocratique du Congo1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En République démocratique du Congo (anciennement le Zaïre), il est généralement admis que les vedettes de la musique populaire utilisent la sorcellerie afin d’assurer leur succès (lupemba). Les rumeurs qui courent à ce sujet veulent que dans certains cas le prix du succès soit le sacrifice (mystique) d’un être cher ou d’un membre de la famille. Publiquement, les musiciens nient toute association avec la sorcellerie : non parce qu’ils ne croient pas en l’existence du phénomène, mais parce qu’y participer serait vu comme anti-social et égoïste. Cela montre à quel point la moralité est un critère d’évaluation du goût esthétique. Sous le régime de Mobutu, la corruption est une stratégie de survie et la circulation de ce genre de rumeurs sert à renforcer l’idée que la réussite individuelle peut se traduire en mobilité sociale autrement que par des moyens sournois et arbitraires.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".