MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1586449717

Removing Barriers and Enhancing Openness: Distance Education as Social Adult Education

2008· article· en· W1586449717 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Learning Practices
Canadian institutionsAthabasca University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDistance educationOpenness to experienceAgency (philosophy)SociologyHigher educationDemocracyPedagogyPolitical scienceCitizen journalismHumanitiesLibrary scienceSocial sciencePsychologyPhilosophyPoliticsSocial psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the benefits claimed for post-secondary distance education is that it removes to learning and is, therefore, open-as suggested in the title of the British distance learning university the or British Columbia's Learning Agency. However, openness and accessibility, as they are currently understood, are not to be equated with the traditional adult education goal of providing education for participation in democratic society. Social purpose education, which leads to an enhanced participatory democracy, has been pushed to the margins of the purposes of traditional western distance education. It can be argued that, given the internal institutional constraints of delivery-centred distance education institutions and systems, distance education on its own cannot remove all barriers and become truly and Open, accessible, social purpose adult education can only be rebuilt in collaboration with other educational and community groups. In order to explore these issues this paper will begin by examining the barriers to education and then will consider ways to open up access in distance education. L'un des avantages que revendique l'education a distance au niveau post-secondaire est de supprimer les « obstacles » a l'apprentissage qui devient donc plus « ouvert », comme le traduit si bien le nom de l'universite britannique d'enseignement a distance, la « Open University », ou, en Colombie-Britannique, le « Open Learning Agency ». Il ne faut cependant pas etablir de parallele entre le concept de l'education traditionnelle des adultes, c'est-a-dire d'enseigner pour preparer les etudiants en vue de leur participation au sein d'une societe democratique. L'objectif social de l'education, soit la participation a la democratie est un objectif secondaire de l'education traditionnelle « occidentale ». On peut alleguer qu'en raison des contrainte internes des etablissements et des systemes d'education a distance qui mettent l'accent sur l'enseignement, l'education a distance ne peut a elle seule obvier a toutes les difficultes et devenir vraiment « ouverte » et « accessible ». Un systeme d'education des adultes ouvert, accessible et jouant un role social n'est possible qu'avec la collaboration d'autres groupes educatifs et communautaires. Ce document s'attarde donc sur ces questions; il commence d'abord par examiner les obstacles a l'education, puis etudie les moyens de rendre l'education a distance plus accessible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.709
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHigher Education Learning PracticesFrench-language works237,207