MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1586474125 · doi:10.1109/iccw.2015.7247203

Modified Floyd-Warshall algorithm for equal cost multipath in software-defined data center

2015· article· en· W1586474125 on OpenAlexaff
Akinniyi Ojo, Ngok-Wa Ma, Isaac Woungang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceOpenFlowFloyd–Warshall algorithmSoftware-defined networkingLoad balancing (electrical power)Cloud computingDistributed computingComputationAlgorithmData centerMultipath propagationShortest path problemLatency (audio)Path (computing)SoftwareComputer networkReal-time computingK shortest path routingTheoretical computer scienceGraphOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Load balancing in data centers have been a common practice in the last couple of decades. This has been done statically in traditional networks with little or no feedback information from the underlying network state. With the current large cloud data centers and continuous changing traffic patterns, the drive for more interactive and dynamic solution to reduce the latency and improve the network resources utilization has brought about the Software Defined Networking Paradigm. However, some load balancing solutions have been proposed, utilizing OpenFlow without a well-defined algorithm to reduce the path computation complexity as requests arrive on the network. This paper proposes a path load-balancing algorithm which utilizes a modified Floyd-Warshall All-Pairs Shortest Paths algorithm to compute and store equal cost paths information, utilizes the stored information for path selection, and maintain a real-time updates of those paths. Our evaluation demonstrates that the proposed algorithm performs better than the Global First Fit algorithm as we have significantly reduced the time to service request as a result of eliminating the recursive path computation for every client request.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.138
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207