Defining Electronic Series: A Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article explore la faon dont les sries de documents lectroniques oprationnels, c'est--dire les sries de documents telles qu'elles furent cres, conserves et utilises par les crateurs au cours de leurs activits, sont transformes par le processus d'acquisition en sries archivistiques.L'auteur soutient que les postulats qui sous-tendent le processus d'acquisition et qui furent dveloppes dans le contexte d'un environnement papier auraient besoin d'tre rexamines afin d'tre utilises dans un environnement lectronique en s'appuyant sur des exemples tirs de ses rcentes expriences aux Archives de l'Ontario.L'article se termine sur des observations quant l'impact de l'acquisition de sries de documents lectroniques pour les institutions d'archives.ABSTRACT This article explores the way operational electronic series, i.e., series of records as they were created, maintained, and used by creators during their normal course of business, are transformed into archival series by the acquisition process.It contends that the assumptions behind acquisition processes developed in the paper environment may need re-examination for use in the electronic environment, using illustrations drawn from recent experiences at the Archives of Ontario.The article closes with some observations on the impact of acquiring electronic series on archival institutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".