La poursuite des études à l'âge adulte et ses répercussions sur les gains au Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette etude, menee par Statistique Canada, tente d'identifier qui sont les personnes qui poursuivent leurs etudes a l'âge adulte et les retombees de ces apprentissages. L'etude est fondee sur les donnees de l'Enquete sur la dynamique du travail et du revenu (EDTR) et documente les modeles de participation et les repercussions sur les gains et les salaires des etudes a l'âge adulte pour la periode de reference de 1997 a 2000. Elle demontre que les adultes qui poursuivent leur scolarisation et qui obtiennent un certificat postsecondaire voient leur remuneration augmenter de facon significative. Les resultats montrent que la decision de poursuivre des etudes comporte une correlation etroite avec diverses caracteristiques individuelles comme l'âge, le niveau de scolarite initial et l'etat matrimonial.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".