MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1586562597 · doi:10.1109/plasma.2002.1030473

Kinetic modeling of an atmospheric pressure argon plasma in contact with a floating collector

2003· article· en· W1586562597 on OpenAlexaff
Sylvain Coulombe, Jean‐Luc Meunier, Merit Shoucri

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlasma Applications and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDebye lengthAtomic physicsPhysicsPoisson's equationBoltzmann equationPlasmaKinetic energyVelocity MomentsElectronArgonIonComputational physicsClassical mechanicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary form only given, as follows. The problem of an atmospheric pressure argon plasma in contact with a floating collector is considered through the framework of the kinetic Boltzmann equation. A BGK collision term where only weak deviations from the Maxwellian velocity distribution are allowed is considered for the electron equation. This collision term for the ion is more comprehensive and accounts for large potential deviations from the Maxwellian distribution. Due to the relatively low mean energies expected, only the momentum transfer collisions are considered. The normalized Boltzmann equations are solved self-consistently with Poisson's equation using the method of fractional steps with cubic spline interpolation. The results show that the sheath region extends about 25 Debye lengths from the floating collector surface and that the sheath voltage drop is /spl sim/6.5 V. The electron current density peaks at a distance of /spl sim/9 Debye lengths while the ion current remains essentially constant from the plasma edge to the collector up to a distance of /spl sim/9 Debye lengths, and then sharply drops to zero at the collector surface. Both currents at the collector are similar in magnitude giving rise to a zero collection current. The electron velocity distribution remains very close to a Maxwellian throughout the x-space while the ion distribution shows a smooth transition from a Maxwellian at the plasma edge to a distribution showing strong ion accelerations towards negative velocities near the collector surface. Further work is in progress to extend the kinetic model to include a thermionic electron beam and aims at a kinetic description of the cathode region of high-pressure arc discharges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score0.269

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlasma Applications and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207