Regulation of Sulfated Glycoprotein‐1 and Cathepsin D Expression in Adult Rat Epididymis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Endocytosis, whereby proteins are internalized from the epididymal lumen to be eventually degraded in lysosomes, is one of the major functions of the epididymal epithelial cells in maintaining a proper luminal milieu conducive for sperm maturation. In the present study, using light microscope immunocytochemical methods, we examined the regulation of 2 lysosomal enzymes, sulfated glycoprotein-1 (SGP-1) and cathepsin D, in adult rat epididymides fixed in Bouin fixative and embedded in paraffin. After orchidectomy (O) with or without testosterone (T) supplementation, efferent duct ligation (EDL), or hypophysectomy (H), lysosomes of principal cells were intensely reactive with the anti-SGP-1 antibody, as were narrow, clear, and basal cells, with staining patterns similar to that of control animals. These experimental procedures also had no effect on cathepsin D expression in all cell types, except for clear cells of the corpus and cauda epididymidis, which after orchiedectomy and hypophysectomy, became intensely reactive, unlike their completely unreactive state in control animals. In O+T animals, as well as in EDL animals, clear cells remained unreactive. These data taken together suggest that expression of SGP-1 is not under the control of testicular or pituitary factors, as is also the case for cathepsin D expression by principal, narrow, and basal cells. However, specific inhibition of cathepsin D expression by testosterone or one of its metabolites appears to occur in clear cells of the corpus and cauda epididymidis. Furthermore, in addition to small, typical lysosomes, principal cells also revealed large supranuclear and infranuclear spherical structures that were immunoreactive with both anti-SGP-1 and anti-cathepsin D antibodies, suggesting their lysosomal nature. With electron microscopy, these structures appeared electron-lucent and contained membranous profiles embedded in an electron-dense, granular background. Such images suggest that the various experimental procedures adversely affect the expression of several other lysosomal enzymes in principal cells, leading to a lysosomal phenotype similar to that observed in various lysosomal storage diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".