MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1586638331 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2005.1465139

Performance Comparison of Quantum-dot Cellular Automata Adders

2005· article· en· W1586638331 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum-Dot Cellular Automata
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCMC Microsystems
KeywordsAdderComputer scienceCarry (investment)Quantum dot cellular automatonCarry-save adderCellular automatonSerial binary adderLatency (audio)ArithmeticParallel computingElectronic engineeringAlgorithmMathematicsEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

QCA adders are fundamental building blocks of complex QCA computational units. In our analysis, we show that QCA ripple-carry adder and bit-serial adder designs actually outperform carry-look-ahead and carry-select adder designs. The QCA ripple-carry and bit-serial adders require fewer clocking zones, which have been found to be the main contributing factor toward overall circuit latency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.811
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations91
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicQuantum-Dot Cellular AutomataFrench-language works237,207