MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Development of Monolithic YSZ Porous and Dense Layers through Multiple Slip Casting for Ceramic Fuel Cell Applications

2011· article· en· W1586668539 on OpenAlexaff
Amir Reza Hanifi, Alyssa Shinbine, Thomas H. Etsell, Partha Sarkar

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Canadian institutionsAlberta InnovatesUniversity of Alberta
FundersDirectorate for Biological Sciences
KeywordsMaterials scienceCalcinationYttria-stabilized zirconiaPorositySinteringElectrolyteCeramicComposite materialChemical engineeringCubic zirconiaCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this research YSZ porous support and thin dense functional electrolyte layers are fabricated via a slip‐casting method for fuel cell applications. The results show that calcination of YSZ starting powder is a crucial step in developing an effective porous structure having an interconnected void network for fuel cell applications. It is found that due to high surface area and high sinterability, as‐received Tosoh YSZ powder is not a suitable candidate for production of interconnected porous structures even with the addition of pore former. Calcination at 1300–1500°C coarsens the YSZ powder and leads to the growth of particles to 15–100 μm. However, subsequent ball milling of the calcined powder for 72 h reduces the particle size to 400–800 nm (∼240 nm for uncalcined Tosoh YSZ) and increases the subsequent surface area, correlating with the temperature of calcination. With high‐temperature calcination, it is possible to generate interconnected porous structures after sintering at temperatures lower than the calcination temperature. The bodies made of powder calcined at 1300°C become dense following sintering at 1350°C, which makes this material suitable as a dense fuel cell electrolyte. Using calcined powders, a multiple slip‐casting procedure enables a dense electrolyte to be coated directly on a highly porous support. With this simple and inexpensive technique, high‐quality strongly adhered YSZ layers can be engineered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Applied Ceramic TechnologySame topicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsFrench-language works237,207