MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Nuclear astrophysics with radioactive ions at FAIR

2016· article· en· W1586680391 on OpenAlexafffund
R. Reifarth, S. Altstadt, K. Göbel, T. Heftrich, M. Heil, Alexander Koloczek, C. Langer, R. Plag, Maurice Pohl, K. Sonnabend, M. Weigand, T. Adachi, F. Aksouh, Jim Al-Khalili, M. Al-Garawi, Saleh Al‐Ghamdi, G. Alkhazov, N. Alkhomashi, H. Álvarez-Pol, R. Álvarez-Rodríguez, V. Andreev, B Andrei, L. Atar, T. Aumann, V.V. Avdeichikov, C.O. Bacri, S. Bagchi, C. Barbieri, S. Beceiro-Novo, Ch. Beck, C. Beinrucker, G. Bélier, D. Bemmerer, Michael Bendel, J. Benlliure, G. Benzoni, R. Berjillos, D. Bertini, C. A. Bertulani, S. Bishop, N. Blasi, Tanya Bloch, Y. Blumenfeld, A. Bonaccorso, K. Boretzky, A. S. Botvina, A. Boudard, P. Boutachkov, I. Boztosun, A. Bracco, S. Brambilla, M. Caamaño, C. Caesar, F. Camera, E. Casarejos, W. N. Catford, J. Cederkäll, B. Cederwall, M. Chartier, A. Chatillon, Mădălin Cherciu, L.V. Chulkov, P. J. Coleman-Smith, D. Cortina‐Gil, F. C. L. Crespi, R. Crespo, J.R. Cresswell, M. Csatlós, F. Déchery, B. Davids, T. Davinson, V. Derya, P. Detistov, P. Díaz Fernández, Douglas D. DiJulio, S Dmitry, D. Doré, J. A. Dueñas, E. Dupont, P. Egelhof, И. А. Егорова, Z. Elekes, J. Enders, J. Endres, S. N. Ershov, O. Ershova, B. Fernández–Domínguez, A. V. Fetisov, Enrico Fiori, A. Fomichev, M. Fonseca, L. M. Fraile, M. Freer, J. Friese, MJ Garcia Borge, Susanne Gannon, U. Garg, I. Gašparić, L. R. Gasques, B. Gastineau, H. Geißel, R. Gernhäuser, T. K. Ghosh, Matthias Gilbert, J. Glorius, P. Golubev, A. V. Gorshkov, Anil K. Gourishetty, L. V. Grigorenko, J. Gulyás, M. Haiduc, F. Hammache, M.N. Harakeh, M. Hass, M. Heine, Andreas Hennig, Ana Margarida Henriques, R.‐D. Herzberg, M. Holl, A. Ignatov, A.V. Ignatyuk, S. Ilieva, M. V. Ivanov, N. Iwasa, B. Jakobsson, H. Johansson, B. Jonson, P. Joshi, A. Junghans, B. Jurado, G. Körner, N. Kalantar, R. Kanungo, A. Kelić-Heil, K. Kezzar, E. Khan, A. Khanzadeev, O. Kiselev, M. Kogimtzis, D. Körper, S. Kräckmann, T. Kröll, R. Krücken, A. Krasznahorkay, J. V. Kratz, D. Kresan, T. Krings, A. M. Krumbholz, S. A. Krupko, R. Kulessa, Suresh Kumar, N. Kurz, E. A. Kuzmin, M. Labiche, K. Langanke, I. Lazarus, T. Le Bleis, C. Lederer, A. Lemasson, R. C. Lemmon, V. Liberati, Yu. A. Litvinov, B. Löher, Joaquín L. Herraiz, G. Münzenberg, Jorge Machado, E. M. Maev, K. Mahata, Davide Mancusi, J. Marganiec, V Marusov, D. Mengoni, B. Million, V. Morcelle, O. Moreno, A. Movsesyan, E. Nácher, M. A. Najafi, T. Nakamura, F. Naqvi, E. Yu. Nikolski, T. Nilsson, C. Nociforo, P. Nolan, B. G. Novatsky, G. Nyman, A. Ornelas, R. Palit, S. K. Pandit, V. Panin, C. Paradela, V. V. Parkar, S. Paschalis, P. Pawłowski, Á. Perea, J. Pereira, C. M. Petrache, M. Petri, S. G. Pickstone, N. Pietralla, S. Piétri, Yu.L. Pivovarov, M. Potlog, A. Prokofiev, G. Rastrepina, T. Rauscher, G. Ribeiro, M. V. Ricciardi, A. Richter, C. Rigollet, K. Riisager, Arnau Rios, Christian Ritter, T Rodriguez Frutos, Javier Rodriguez Vignote, M. Röder, C. Romig, D. Rossi, P. Roussel‐Chomaz, P. C. Rout, S. Roy, P.-A. Söderström, M. Saha Sarkar, S.B. Sakuta, M.-D. Salsac, J.A. Sampson, J. Sánchez, del Rio Saez, J. Sánchez Rosado, M. S. Sanjari, P. Sarriguren, A. Sauerwein, D. Savran, C. Scheidenberger, H. Scheit, S. Schmidt, C. Schmitt, L. Schnorrenberger, P. Schrock, R. Schwengner, D. Seddon, B. M. Sherrill, A. Shrivastava, S. I. Sidorchuk, J Silva, H. Simon, E. C. Simpson, Pushpendra P. Singh, D Slobodan, D. Sohler, M. Spieker, D. Stach, E. Stan, M. Stănoiu, S. V. Stepantsov, P. D. Stevenson, F. Strieder, L. Stuhl, T. Suda, K. Sümmerer, B. Štreicher, Julien Taı̈eb, M. Takechi, I. Tanihata, J. T. Taylor, O. Tengblad, G. M. Ter–Akopian, S. Terashima, P. Teubig, R. Thies, M. Thoennessen, T. Thomas, J. Thornhill, Göran Thungström, J. Timár, Y. Togano, T. G. Tornyi, J. A. Tostevin, C. Townsley, W. Trautmann, T. Trivedi, S. Typel, E. Uberseder, J. M. Udı́as, T. Uesaka, Z. Vajta, Paulo Eduardo Neves Ferreira Velho, V. Vikhrov, Meiko Volknandt, V. Volkov, P. von Neumann–Cosel, M. von Schmid, A. Wagner, F. Wamers, H. Weick, D. Wells, L. Westerberg, O. Wieland, M. Wiescher, K. Wimmer, J. S. Winfield, M. Winkel, P. J. Woods, R. Wyss, D. Yakorev, Michael I. Yavor, Jaime Cardona, I Zartova, T. Zerguerras, M Zgura, A. Zhdanov, M. V. Zhukov, M. Ziębliński, A. Zilges, Κ. Zuber

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's UniversityTRIUMF
FundersExtreMe Matter Institute, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für SchwerionenforschungEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilUniversità degli Studi di PadovaUppsala UniversitetUniversität zu KölnUniversidade de São PauloUniversity of DelhiIndian Institute of Technology RoorkeeTechnische Universität DresdenEmberi Eroforrások MinisztériumaTRIUMFWeizmann Institute of ScienceKungliga Tekniska HögskolanBhabha Atomic Research CentreBeihang UniversityRIKENTata Institute of Fundamental ResearchUniversity of Notre DameChalmers Tekniska HögskolaRijksuniversiteit GroningenUniversity of the West of ScotlandNuclear PhysicsInstitutul National de Cercetare-Dezvoltare pentru Fizica si Inginerie Nucleara 'Horia Hulubei'Helmholtz Graduate School for Hadron and Ion ResearchDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftScience and Technology Facilities CouncilUniversität BaselMittuniversitetetYale University
KeywordsNucleosynthesisNuclear astrophysicsr-processIsotopeNuclear physicsPhysicsNeutronRadiochemistryShielded cableRadioactive decayProtonIonNuclear fusionChemistryNuclear reactionComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The nucleosynthesis of elements beyond iron is dominated by neutron captures
\nin the s and r processes. However, 32 stable, proton-rich isotopes cannot be formed during
\nthose processes, because they are shielded from the s-process 
\now and r-process -decay chains.
\nThese nuclei are attributed to the p and rp process.
\nFor all those processes, current research in nuclear astrophysics addresses the need for more
\nprecise reaction data involving radioactive isotopes. Depending on the particular reaction, direct
\nor inverse kinematics, forward or time-reversed direction are investigated to determine or at least
\nto constrain the desired reaction cross sections.
\nThe Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research (FAIR) will o er unique, unprecedented
\nopportunities to investigate many of the important reactions. The high yield of radioactive
\nisotopes, even far away from the valley of stability, allows the investigation of isotopes involved
\nin processes as exotic as the r or rp processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.480
Threshold uncertainty score0.612

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207