MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1586693901

Pengaruh Gaya Indis Pada Interior Gereja Kristen Jawi Wetan Jemaat Surabaya

2015· article· id· W1586693901 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Enggar Hadi Prayogo

Bibliographic record

VenueIntra · 2015
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchitectural and Urban Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStyle (visual arts)CraftWest indiesArtColonialismQuarter (Canadian coin)Visual artsArt historyArchitectureHumanitiesGeographyHistoryArchaeologyEthnology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Indies style is a style that has the special characteristic of the influence of colonial style that invaded the town of Java. GKJW Church Surabaya established in 1924, is located in Jl.Prof.Dr.Moestopo church where the location affected by the spread of culture Indies. The distinctive feature of the interior of the church that stands out from other GKJW Church, located on the square layout elongated linear shape, and experienced the formation to form a cross, with the concept of a centralized circulation to the linear circulation. This study aims to determine the extent of the effect of force on the interior GKJW Indies Church Surabaya, and what impact that occurs due to the influence Indies style. The method used by researchers, using qualitative methods produce descriptive form of words written or spoken of those that can be observed. The results showed that the style used church interior is a modern classic style, besides there are other styles which are Art and Craft, Art Deco, and Art Neoveau. The architecture of the building as a whole are affected Indies style.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntraSame topicArchitectural and Urban StudiesFrench-language works237,207