Folklorama, Brommtopp et politique. Mise au point sur les rituels et festivals postcoloniaux dans le Manitoba
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Malgre les tentatives des organisateurs de festivals multiculturels/ethniques/nationaux d’en effacer toutes les implications politiques, la promotion de la culture associee a des imperatifs de profit ne peut jamais s’en trouver entierement depourvue. Par ailleurs, et ce malgre les assertions presentant les rituels communautaires comme des pratiques intrinsequement inoffensives, des elements racistes et colonialistes peuvent facilement s’y immiscer. Afin d’etayer ces affirmations, nous avons choisi d’analyser comparativement deux exemples concrets, interessants d’un point de vue ethnomusicologique – un festival et un rituel – et de montrer comment des chansons apparemment simples peuvent impliquer ces dimensions delicates. Nous explorons ainsi les enjeux negocies au travers du festival et du rituel, en comparant la mise en scene de l’identite et ses implications dans leurs contextes respectifs : l’ethnospectacle touristique (festival) du Folklorama de Winnipeg et le rituel de visites domestiques de la tradition mennonite du Brommtopp dans la province du Manitoba.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".