Régulation familiale, marchande ou politique : les variations de la relation travail-famille
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les changements socio-démographiques recensés dans la plupart des pays développés, au cours des trente dernières années, conduisent à un double constat. Tout d'abord, ils affectent tant les structures économiques que les structures familiales. Ensuite, on est frappé de la concomitance des évolutions. C'est pourquoi on doit analyser conjointement, et non plus séparément, le travail et la famille. La reconstruction des catégories de la pratique que ces changements véhiculent engage, en effet, à reconsidérer les catégories de l'analyse. C'est le sens de l'approche centrée autour de la notion de " division familiale du travail ". De fait, on assiste à une restructuration des rapports sociaux à l'intérieur de la famille comme de la société où se mettent en place de nouveaux modes de régulation. Familale, marchande ou politique, cette régulation sociétale varie suivant les pays, les moments, dans un jeu complexe entre institutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".