MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1586984771 · doi:10.1111/ajgw.12075

Within-vineyard variation in the ‘pepper’ compound rotundone is spatially structured and related to variation in the land underlying the vineyard

2014· article· en· W1586984771 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Nathan Scarlett, R. G. V. Bramley, Tracey Siebert

Bibliographic record

VenueAustralian Journal of Grape and Wine Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicHorticultural and Viticultural Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAustralian GovernmentCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationAlberta Water Research InstituteAmerican Heart Association
KeywordsVineyardVineVariation (astronomy)BerryTerroirHorticultureWineSpatial variabilityEnvironmental scienceBotanyBiologyMathematicsFood scienceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Aims Previous studies have highlighted the importance of vineyard variability and the benefits that may accrue through targeting management in response to it. In this study, we were interested to see whether the concentration of rotundone in Shiraz (Vitis vinifera L.) grapes was spatially structured and related to other aspects of vineyard variability so as to inform the possible selective harvesting of grapes destined for wines of ‘peppery’ character. Methods and Results Immediately prior to harvest of a 6.1-ha block in the Grampians region of Victoria, a region known for producing wines of ‘peppery’ character, fruit was sampled from 177 ‘target vines’ and analysed for its rotundone concentration. The resulting data were mapped and overlain with other map layers describing variation in soils, topography and vine vigour. Berry rotundone concentration was found to be markedly spatially variable. The results further suggest that within-vineyard variation in berry rotundone concentration is associated with variation in soil properties and topography, with the influence of the latter on ambient temperature implicated as a likely key driver of rotundone variation. Conclusions Consistent with previous analyses of variability in indices of fruit quality, variation in berry rotundone concentration was found to be spatially structured; that is, its variation was not random. As with these previous studies, variation in berry rotundone concentration was associated with variation in the land underlying the vineyard. Significance of the Study To our knowledge, this is the first study of within-vineyard spatial variability in a grape-derived flavour compound. It highlights the potential opportunity, with further understanding of rotundone biosynthesis, to use selective harvesting and/or viticultural manipulation as a means of influencing wine style – in this case the ‘pepperiness’ of Shiraz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations91
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAustralian Journal of Grape and Wine ResearchSame topicHorticultural and Viticultural ResearchFrench-language works237,207