Le Coup de dés numérisé : modèles, défis, perspectives
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
S’il existe peu de différences formelles entre l’analogique et le numérique, quand on ajoute l’interactivité et d’autres aspects dynamiques au texte numérique, des différences structurelles fondamentales se présentent. La mise en page du document électronique augmente la lecture humaine, selon la notion mcluhanesque de l’extension, mais le potentiel de l’édition numérique ne s’arrête pas là. En numérisant la poésie de Mallarmé, comme dans le projet Mallarmé Hypertext, il s’agit de trouver du potentiel à partir de la rencontre du texte et du balisage. Désormais, on peut réinventer le texte en trouvant des modèles conceptuels qui démontrent autrement la textualité mallarméenne. Toutefois, la médialité chez Mallarmé souligne les limites du dispositif numérique, et la lecture hypermédiatique exige une perspective hybride. Le but est de trouver de nouveaux modèles tout en scrutant les limites de ces modèles, afin de voir ce que c’est que lire au sein de la singularité technologique. If there are few formal differences between the analog and the digital, when interactivity and other dynamics of the digital text are added, fundamental structural differences occur. Putting the electronic document on the screen augments human reading, according to the McLuhanesque notion of extention, but the potential of the digital edition doesn’t stop there. In digitizing the poetry of Mallarmé, as in the Mallarmé Hypertext project, one finds potential in the encounter between the text and the mark-up. From there, it is possible to reinvent the text by finding new conceptual models of Mallarméean textuality. However, the mediality in Mallarmé highlights the limits of the digital apparatus, and hypermedial reading necessitates a hybrid perspective. The goal is to find new models whilst discerning the limits of these models, in order to see what it means to read in the singularity of the technological. Article reçu le 13/05/2011; accepté le 19/12/2011
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it