MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1587235002 · doi:10.1109/iecon.2003.1280721

Zero-order three-phase phase-locked loops

2004· article· en· W1587235002 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsHoneywell (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Feed forwardPhase (matter)Transfer functionMinimum phasePhase-locked loopInverseZero (linguistics)Loop (graph theory)MathematicsComputer sciencePhysicsControl (management)EngineeringControl engineeringQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A method of minimizing dynamics and reducing phase error towards zero for arbitrary input frequency/phase while maintaining stability in three-phase phase-locked loops is presented. Theoretically, the system transfer function becomes of zero order and the error is zero. Practically, the steady state phase error is zero and the system is of minimum dynamics/order. The method is in synthesizing a feedforward control that is added to the standard three-phase phase-locked loop. The feedforward comprises an inverse feedforward control principle relative to the part of the feedback loop seen after the summing junction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Algorithms and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207