Los sistemas de almacenamiento inka de Tinyaq, Ayacucho, Perú
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Un aspecto de la arqueología regional de Ayacucho que ha recibido poca atención de los arqueólogos, es el caso de la ocupación inka. Si bien el valle de Ayacucho formó parte del Tawantinsuyo, poco es lo que se sabe del rol del mismo dentro de la política administrativa inka. Los varios trabajos de reconocimiento arqueológico realizados en el valle, solamente han dado como resultado la ubicación de muy pocos asentamientos inka. En base a esta información, a menudo se sostiene que el valle en referencia no jugó rol alguno dentro del esquema imperial inka. Sin embargo, la ubicación de los sistemas de almacenamiento de Tinyaq sugiere que este valle no fue del todo abandonado, como muchos sostienen. En este ensayo, es nuestro propósito evaluar el significado de los depósitos de Tinyaq. En base a esta información, sugerimos que el valle de Ayacucho formó parte de las zonas productivas del Tawantinsuyo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".