Replacing The Gull Rock And Little Bay Islands Navigational Sites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The largest recorded hurricane to ever hit the province of Newfoundland and Labrador happened during the time span of September 20-21, 2010. After the destruction of the tropical cyclone was complete, the Canadian Coast Guard was responsible for assessing and fixing all damages caused to the provinces coastal navigational aids. While some sites were not damaged, others such as Gull Rock and Little Bay Islands had to undergo full structure replacement. Gull Rock and Little Bay Islands are both very low lying isolated islands that had their helicopter pads washed away, while Gull Rock lost its navigational tower as well. It is important that all Canadian waterways be safe and easily navigated to meet the standards that the Canadian Coast Guard strives for. It was necessary to design and implement stronger structures in the area. An analysis of waves in the area showed that the current structural designs were not braced properly in the horizontal direction. Larger timbers were chosen and braced in multiple directions for the helicopter pads, while the new navigational tower is a gravity-based design rather than a rock-anchored design. The following paper will outline the hurricane damage assessment, the design and replacement of both the navigational tower and helicopter pads, as well lessons learned from the project.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".