MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1587563743

冠状动脉自体骨髓CD34(上标 +)干细胞移植治疗心绞痛:随机对照临床分析

2009· article· zh· W1587563743 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
王世宏, 崔俊玉, 路敏, 王显, 李晓明, 谭琛, Zhang Jian, 赵怀兵

Bibliographic record

Venue中國組織工程研究與臨床康復 · 2009
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldMedicine
TopicMesenchymal stem cell research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnginaTransplantationSurgeryCanadian Cardiovascular SocietyCoronary artery diseaseStem cellCD34Internal medicineBone marrowMyocardial infarctionCardiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Bone marrow CD34(superscript +) stem cells have significant promoting effects on angiogenesis. Presently, authors only searched one study concerning bone marrow CD34(superscript +) stem cells for treating angina pectoris by direct injection into ventricle in small samples. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transplantation of autologous bone marrow CD34(superscript +) stem cells for angina. DESIGN, TIME AND SETTING: The retrospective case analysis. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 32 patients suffered from angina were selected from the Department of Cardiology, General Hospital of Beijing Military Area Command of Chinese PLA from July 2007 to July 2008.They were randomly assigned into treatment and control groups. None of them had the history of acute myocardial infarction within 1 month before transplantation. Angina grade was from Ⅱ-Ⅳ grades by Canada Cardiovascular Association. No significant differences in baseline data were detected between two groups (P > 0.05). METHODS: Following optimal drug treatment and conventional PCI, patients in the treatment group received autologous bone marrow CD34(superscript +) stem cell transplantation through coronary artery.15 mL of CD34(superscript +) stem cell suspension, about (1.0-6.1)×10^6 cells, was infused into the proximal end of coronary artery disease lesion. Patients in the control group only received optimal drug treatment and catheter implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Curative effect indices and hemoperfusion in patients of both groups following transplantation. RESULTS: Following bone marrow stem cell transplantation, angina pectoris attaches, nitroglycerin dose, movement time and Canadian Cardiovascular Society class indices were better in the treatment group compared with the control group (P<0.001-0.05). At 6 months following transplantation, the therapeutic efficacy was better compared with that at 3 months. At 6 months, myocardial perfusion defect area was significantly smaller in the treatment group compared with the control group (P<0.01).Within 6 months follow-up, myocardial infarction, cardiac enzyme elevation, perforation, pericardial effusion, ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation induced by intracoronary injection were not detected. CONCLUSION: Intracoronary transplantation of autologous bone marrow CD34(superscript +) stem cells is safe and efficient for angina, and can effectively improve myocardial hemoperfusion in angina patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue中國組織工程研究與臨床康復Same topicMesenchymal stem cell researchFrench-language works237,207