MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1587652081 · doi:10.14483/23448393.2307

Desarrollo de una Metodología para seguir y discriminar el Movimiento de un Ojo Humano en Tiempo Real

2006· article· es· W1587652081 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRepositorio Universidad Distrital · 2006
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldComputer Science
TopicGaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRobustness (evolution)ImpossibilityArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes the development of tracking and discriminate methodology for human eye movements. This methodology is the first stage of a research project oriented for the development of a human-machine interface for disability patients. The purpose of project is help to solve some common problems of this people, such as the impossibility to communicate and to interact with the environment. The methodology uses digital image processing for eye tracking and computational intelligence methods for eye movement classifying. The methodology is software-based develop for real time operation. Several tests for a particular patient and for others were made. Results of test show the efficacy of the methodology for a particular patient. However, the develop needs to improve his robustness for work with several patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.474
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it