MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1587836314

The Mill and the Cross (2011)

2011· article· en· W1587836314 on OpenAlexaff
David Humbert

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Religion & Film · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Tourism and Spaces
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativePaintingArtMillSubject (documents)Art historyVisual artsLiteratureHistoryComputer scienceArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is a film review of The Mill and the Cross (2011). This film review is available in Journal of Religion & Film: http://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol15/iss2/12 Polish-American director Lech Majewski’s The Mill and the Cross opens with a painterly re-enactment, or re-embodiment, of Pieter Bruegel’s masterpiece The Way to Calvary. In the opening sequence, actors don the robes and dresses of principal characters in the painting. Majewski, himself a painter, spent three years adding three dimensional figures and CGI animations, integrating these seamlessly into a constructed narrative. These animations, for once, are not used for the sake of crude verisimilitude but to painterly effect, reverently accenting a canvas deeply symbolic in its implications. The central mystery of the work, as we are informed later, is the placement and treatment of its subject, the suffering Christ, laboring under the cross he carries on his way to Calvary. The figure is surprisingly small, lost in a crowd of soldiers and distracted citizenry, while the whole tableau is framed by mourning Mother Mary and ministering saints in the foreground, a mysterious mill on a high cliff to the rear, and Calvary itself, nearly lost in the distance in the upper right-hand corner of the work. The film is inspired by the fascinating book of the same title by Michael Francis Gibson, an art historian and collaborator on the script, yet sets off in a direction of its own to tell the stories of several characters, beginning and ending with the key elements of the painting itself. Early on we see a series of seemingly disconnected scenes and incidents that unfold without dialogue, just as Bruegel 1 Humbert: The Mill and the Cross (2011) Published by DigitalCommons@UNO, 2012 draws us into his painting by assembling a variety of figures and incidents, the connection between which is at first obscure. Woodcutters fell trees in a nearsilent forest; a loving peasant couple awakens in their bed to kiss and embrace; a somber miller awakens his corpulent, sour-faced wife with a shove. The mill they inhabit, furthermore, is no ordinary mill, but one that extends vertiginously upwards through the rock-face of a cliff. Here the documentary and the fantastic meet, as the mill turns out to be the one depicted in the painting. Later we see the miller, a tiny figure in the painting, in medium close-up as he grimly and dispassionately surveys the action that transpires below. The mill, we are soon told, is one important key to the meaning of the painting. According to Bruegel, who is portrayed in the film with humoristic gravitas by Rutger Hauer, the miller takes the place of God, who in earlier, more traditional paintings is portrayed as parting the clouds and glowering disapprovingly on events below. In the absence of God, the mill-wheel grinds out the fates of human beings. The mill is said to have cosmic and mythic dimensions as a sort of axis mundi – its treatment in film and book apparently influenced by the remarkable study by Giorgio de Santillana, Hamlet’s Mill. In one incident, a young man is strapped to a wheel erected on a pole, and exposed, gruesomely, to scavenging crows. The unjust execution of a man on a wheel not only echoes the mill-wheel, but also the depiction of Calvary in the corner of the painting, which 2 Journal of Religion & Film, Vol. 15 [2012], Iss. 2, Art. 12 http://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol15/iss2/12 is ringed by a group of peasants waiting anxiously for the execution. Both echo the larger formal structure in which Christ is placed at the centre among the symbolic elements within the frame. The action of the mill, too, Majewski has stated in an interview, reproduces the remorseless grinding down of Christ during the crucifixion. The crowd below ignores the suffering Christ, as Bruegel points out to his burgher friend and patron, its attention drawn by the struggle of the disciple Simon with the soldiers, who are forcing him to help carry the cross. As Bruegel grimly comments: “Whether it be the death of the Saviour, or the fall of Icarus ... these world-changing events go unnoticed by the crowd.” Director Majewski translates with admirable economy, not to mention visual power and artistic courage, the central dilemmas and mysteries of The Way of Calvary with a skillful blend of incident and visual tableau. Some will claim that realistic characters or a coherent narrative is lacking but this is to miss the point entirely. The film ushers us into the imagined world of the painting itself, which cannot be absorbed in a single glance. This is perhaps why the filmmaker concludes with a haunting reverse zoom into the Munich museum where the painting hangs, open and yet concealed to our gaze. 3 Humbert: The Mill and the Cross (2011) Published by DigitalCommons@UNO, 2012

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score0.707

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Religion & FilmSame topicReligious Tourism and SpacesFrench-language works237,207