MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1587933445 · doi:10.1109/dasip.2014.7115629

Communication-model based embedded mapping of dataflow actors on heterogeneous MPSoC

2014· preprint· en· W1587933445 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thanh Dinh Ngo, Daniel Sepúlveda, Kévin Martin, Jean-Philippe Diguet

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInterconnection Networks and Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCommercializations Promotion Agency for R and D OutcomesMinistry of Economy, Trade and IndustryAgence Nationale de la RechercheUniversity of Minnesota
KeywordsDataflowMPSoCComputer scienceMultiprocessingComputationParallel computingThroughputSymmetric multiprocessor systemEmbedded systemComputer architectureAlgorithmOperating systemWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mapping a dataflow application onto a heterogeneous multiprocessor platform cannot longer be static. It has to adapt dynamically depending on the data and on the communication between the computation cores. This is typically the case for mobile devices that run multimedia applications. This paper presents an algorithm fast enough to be executed at run-time. In addition to computation cost, our approach relies on a communication model to estimate the delay for transmitting data. The algorithm is compared with METIS tool for random dataflow graphs and two video decoders, MPEG4-SP and HEVC, considering heterogeneous multiprocessor platforms composed of 4 to 8 processors and 6 accelerators. Results on a Zynq platform show that our algorithm is about 40x faster than METIS tool for the same throughput (frames per second) on a platform with 8 processors and 6 accelerators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInterconnection Networks and SystemsFrench-language works237,207