MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1587987471 · doi:10.7202/1022237ar

Caisse d’épargne et ADIE : une confirmation partenariale innovatrice

2002· article· fr· W1587987471 on OpenAlexaff
Marie‐Claire Malo, Alexandrine Lapoutte

Bibliographic record

VenueRECMA · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alors que les forces du marché poussent les organismes de crédit coopératif vers la banalisation, on observe aussi des forces de réciprocité qui font émerger des partenariats entre ces organismes et des associations dans le champ du micro-crédit solidaire. Une configuration partenariale est étudiée dans cet article : la Caisse d’épargne Île-de-France-Paris (CE IDF-Paris) et l’Association pour le droit à l’initiative économique (ADIE) Île-de-France, partenaires dans l’offre de prêts à des micro-entrepreneurs. L’approche socio-économique permet de dégager les caractéristiques institutionnelles et organisationnelles de ce partenariat, de même que les perspectives ouvertes. Ainsi, si ce partenariat permet de mieux répondre aux besoins de personnes exclues du marché financier, il contribue ce faisant à l’actualisation du projet fondateur de la caisse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.685
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRECMASame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207