Impacto ambiental del polvillo del carbón en la salud en Colombia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Colombia es un pais muy biodiverso aunque aun no ha logrado aplicar medidas seguras para salvaguardar esta riqueza natural frente a la explotacion minera, minimizando el impacto ambiental y social sobre la salud. La industria extractiva se precia de cumplir con los mas altos estandares ambientales, sin embargo el gobierno tiene claro que no dispone de una infraestructura de control para hacerlos cumplir. Esto permite establecer que hay una violacion en materia ecologica y seguridad industrial que afecta a los trabajadores mineros y las comunidades adyacentes, sin que haya una politica eficiente al respecto en solucionar esta vulneracion a los derechos humanos. Se trata de presentar aqui una breve sintesis del impacto ambiental sobre la salud debido a la explotacion del carbon y la importancia economica derivada de la exportacion de este mineral. Ademas, se sugiere aplicar el modelo socio-ecologico de la salud de la Carta de OTTAWA (1) en procura de un ecosistema estable y recursos sostenibles: salud del ecosistema.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".