Bisphosphonates for osteoporosis in people with cystic fibrosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is a disorder of bone mineralization that can lead to reduced bone mineral density and an increased risk for fractures. It is found in about one third of adults with cystic fibrosis. Bisphosphonates have been shown to increase bone mineral density and decrease the risk of new fractures in post-menopausal women and in patients receiving long-term oral corticosteroids. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of bisphosphonates on the frequency of fractures, bone mineral density, quality of life, adverse events, study withdrawals, and survival in people with cystic fibrosis. SEARCH STRATEGY: Relevant trials were identified in the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Review Group specialised register of controlled trials by the centre co-ordinator. This register comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearching of relevant journals and of conference proceedings. Additional sources such as abstract books for osteoporosis conferences were hand-searched by the authors. The most recent search(es) were conducted in February 2001. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of at least six months duration that studied the use of bisphosphonates in adults with cystic fibrosis were considered for inclusion. Outcomes included one of the following: fractures, bone mineral density, quality of life, adverse events, study withdrawals, or survival. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Information on study design, participants, interventions, and outcomes was abstracted from included studies. Two independent reviewers abstracted the information. Authors were contacted to obtain missing data. MAIN RESULTS: Two trials were identified in the trials search. Both trials with a total of 65 participants were included in this review. One study examined patients without lung transplants while the other study included only patients who had received a lung transplant. The intervention in both trials was pamidronate administered intravenously every three months. In patients who had not received a lung transplant, bone mineral density at axial sites was increased after six months of treatment in the treatment group compared to the control group (lumbar spine WMD [for % change BMD] = 5.8 [95% CI 4.63 to 6.97], hip WMD = 3.00 [95% CI 1.99 to 4.01]). There was a small decrease in forearm bone mineral density in patients treated with pamidronate versus controls (distal forearm WMD = -1.70 [95% CI -2.46 to -0.94]). Bone pain was the most common adverse event occurring in 11/15 participants not using corticosteroids (RR = 24.40, 95% CI 1.57 to 381.48). There was no difference in survival (RR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.20), although this may be due to short follow-up and small sample size. In patients who had received a lung transplant, the number of new fractures did not change with the use of pamidronate (non-vertebral RR = 3.38 [95% CI 0.39 to 29.29], vertebral RR = 0.56 [95% CI 0.17 to 1.89]). Bone mineral density at axial sites was increased after two years of treatment in the treatment group compared to the control group (lumbar spine WMD [for % change in BMD] = 6.20 [95% CI 4.28 to 8.12], femur WMD = 7.90 [95% CI 5.78 to 10.03]). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous pamidronate increases bone mineral density at axial sites in people with cystic fibrosis, although it can cause severe bone pain in patients not receiving corticosteroids. Additional studies in larger populations are needed to determine the effect on fracture rate and survival.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Review About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Systematic review | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Review About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Systematic review | high |
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.017 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.020 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".