Résistances tacites face à la requalification d’un quartier urbain en voie de gentrification : Regard à partir du quartier Le Maupas, Lausanne.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quand un vent de changement souffle sur une ville, comment les quartiers qui la composent résistent-ils ?Le Maupas, une portion de la ville de Lausanne, présente les signes précurseurs d’un quartier en voie de gentrification. L’adoption dans cette recherche d’une approche praxéologique des espaces publics urbains implique une définition de ce phénomène, capable de rendre compte de ses caractéristiques dynamique et processuelle. Il s’agit d’étudier l’impact des aménagements urbains et de leurs usages. Je propose ici de recourir à des éléments en rapport avec la culture, la mobilité et la convivialité, afin de fournir un éclairage sur les tendances que peut prendre le quartier du Maupas. Ces tendances ne s’accomplissent pas sans quelques résistances explicites et tacites capables de contrecarrer, ou du moins ralentir la reclassification en cours.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".