Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sans être omniprésente dans le roman québécois au xxe siècle, l’image de l’Amérindien a néanmoins joué un rôle significatif dans l’évolution de certaines thématiques romanesques, comme celles des grands espaces et de la nature rédemptrice. Les romanciers québécois ont souvent attribué à la figure de l’Amérindien une fonction symbolique dans le mouvement de prise de conscience de leur appartenance au continent américain. Cette image se révèle ainsi indissociable de l’expression et de la revendication d’une identité nord-américaine, cette dernière étant perçue comme résolument distincte de l’identité française. Cet article vise à dégager quelques-uns des avatars de l’image de l’Amérindien dans le roman québécois de 1945 à nos jours, avatars qui ont été regroupés en deux grands ensembles : d’un côté, les Indiens proprement dits et, de l’autre, les Métis et les faux Indiens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".