MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1588949821

The effect of value-added tax on small to medium-sized developers of residential properties in South Africa

2009· dissertation· en· W1588949821 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
L. Julyan

Bibliographic record

VenueUnisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa) · 2009
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Issues in South Africa
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsValue-added taxBusinessGoods and servicesAd valorem taxTax creditTax reformProperty taxLegislationAccounts payableIndirect taxPublic economicsEconomicsFinanceMarket economy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation deals with the effect of value-added tax on \nsmall to medium-sized developers of residential properties in \nSouth Africa. \nFirstly, the way value-added tax is applied to residential \nproperties in South Africa was established. It was \nascertained that no special concessions exist with regard to \nhousing. \nSecondly, the application of value-added tax to residential \nproperties in the United Kingdom was discussed. It was \nascertained that supplies relating to new residential \npremises are zero-rated. \nThirdly, the application of goods and services tax to \nresidential properties in Canada was discussed. Canadian \ngoods and services tax and harmonious sales tax legislation \ncontains a broad range of special concessions relating to \nresidential property developments. The harmonious sales tax \nwhich applies in some provinces, is a combination of goods \nand services tax and a provincial sales tax. \nFourthly, the way goods and services tax is applied to \nresidential property developments in Australia was \ndetermined. Australian legislation provides for a margin \nscheme to be applied to the development of residential \nproperties. In terms of the margin scheme, goods and \nservices tax is payable on the basis of profit rather than \nturnover. Transfer duty as applied in South Africa was examined as an \nalternative to the value-added tax being applied on \nresidential properties developed by developers registered for \nvalue-added tax purposes. \nThe legislation with regard to developers of residential \nproperties registered for value-added tax, goods and services \ntax and harmonious sales tax purposes was measured against \nthe principles of taxation. On the basis of these results, \nan alternative to the current application of value-added tax \nrelating to developers registered for value-added tax \npurposes in South Africa was proposed that would be in line \nwith that of the selected countries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.233
Threshold uncertainty score0.464

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUnisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa)Same topicLegal Issues in South AfricaFrench-language works237,207