THE GEOLOGY AND GENESIS OF GEM CORUNDUM DEPOSITS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this review is to present the state of \nthe art on the geology and genesis of gem corundum \ndeposits, including the main characteristics and \nclassifications, to an audience of non-specialists, \nacademic students, professional geologists and \ngemologists. The careful detailed descriptions and \nstudies on the geology, mineralogy and structures of \nthe deposits carried out over the last century \nprovides a foundation to unravel their genesis \nthrough new field and laboratory research including \npetrography, mineralogy, gemology, fluid \ninclusions, and stable and radiogenic isotopes. \nDescriptive geology coupled with recent advances \nin geology of gems permits decoding of how some \nof these historical and fabulous deposits formed as \nwell as to estimate exploration potential in the \nfuture. New oxygen isotope data are presented here \nfor the first time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it