MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1589157347 · doi:10.7202/1007498ar

Les protecteurs surnaturels des migrants mexicains

2012· article· fr· W1589157347 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Alfonso Reynoso-Rábago, Cándido González-Pérez, Hugo Adrián Medrano-Hernández

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches amérindiennes au Québec · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Tourism and Spaces
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au Mexique, un grand nombre de travailleurs traversent la frontière des États-Unis pour tenter d’y trouver de l’emploi, même de façon illégale, et plusieurs de ces migrants sans papiers, aspirant au « rêve américain», cherchent de l’aide auprès de protecteurs de l’au-delà et implorent des figures qu’ils considèrent comme célestes, tels Juan Soldado, Jesús Malverde et Santo Toribio Romo. Ce dernier est un saint vénéré de façon officielle par l’Église catholique, mais les deux autres ne sont pas reconnus comme saints par la hiérarchie ecclésiastique. Les auteurs de cet article font une analyse structurale de trois récits sur ce sujet et ils indiquent que ces récits et le culte qu’ils fondent peuvent être situés dans le champ de la religiosité populaire conçue comme un mouvement qui jouit d’une certaine autonomie par rapport au pouvoir ecclésial, comme un effet de la modernité actuelle et comme une forme d’expression religieuse qui poursuit des fins pratiques, terrestres, plutôt que spirituelles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.178
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches amérindiennes au QuébecSame topicReligious Tourism and SpacesFrench-language works237,207