MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1589303503 · doi:10.17851/2317-2096.16.2.44-56

A diferença e a alteridade

2007· article· pt· W1589303503 on OpenAlex
Eurídice Figueiredo

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAletria Revista de Estudos de Literatura · 2007
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Studies and Colonialism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resumo: Este texto se propõe a discutir o pensamento diferencialista da crítica e da literatura norte-americanas presente no tratamento da alteridade em relação às representações dos mestiços e a mostrar que ele é diferente da lógica universalista brasileira. Muito se falou da ideologia do branqueamento no Brasil, que possibilita a passagem de uma cor/raça a outra, considerada superior. Este fenômeno, chamado de passing em inglês, em que os mulatos/mestiços claros podem ocultar sua origem, mudar de região e se fazer passar por brancos, também existe na América do Norte. Este tema – que aparece em vários romances – é altamente problemático nos dias de hoje, em que as minorias são instadas, pelo pensamento politicamente correto, a se assumir e lutar pelo direito à diferença. Esta visão nega ao personagem do mestiço-quase-branco o direito à singularidade e à construção de uma identidade individual(ista), já que ele deve se inserir sempre no âmbito de uma luta coletiva.Palavras-chave: representação do mestiço; literatura do Canadá; literatura dos Estados Unidos.Résumé: Ce texte se propose à discuter la pensée différencialiste, présente dans la critique et la littérature nord-américaines, laquelle se manifeste dans le traitement de l’altérité des Métis et à démontrer ainsi qu’elle se distingue de la logique universaliste brésilienne. On a beaucoup écrit sur l’idéologie du blanchiment au Brésil, qui rend possible le passage d’une couleur/race à l’autre, considérée supérieure. Ce phénomène, dénommé passing en anglais, par lequel les mulâtres/métis clairs de peau peuvent cacher leur origine, changer de région et se faire passer pour blancs, existe aussi en Amérique du Nord. Ce thème – qui apparaît dans plusieurs romans – est très problématique de nos jours, quand les minorités sont amenées par la pensée de la correction politique à s’assumer et à lutter en faveur du droit à la différence. Cette vision dénie au personnage du métis-presque-blanc le droit à la singularité et à la construction d’une identité individuelle/individualiste puisqu’il doit s’insérer toujours dans le cadre d’une lutte collective.Mots-clés: représentation du Métis; littérature du Canada; littérature des Etats-Unis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0050.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it