Multi-dimensional sequential web mining by utilizing fuzzy interferencing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There are several applications of sequential web mining, which is used to find the frequent subsequences in a web log in the World Wide Web (the web). We implemented a tool to analyze the sequential behavior of web log access patterns in multiple-dimensions. Sequences of frequent access patterns may change temporally and spatially. Based on the specified criteria like year, month, day, hours and location, the end-user is able to tune the minimum support threshold parameter intuitively using the fuzzy inference mechanism. Domain experts are can access several criteria, including minimum support threshold and number of accesses according to the user intuition, which is later, transformed into fuzzy inference parameters. We propose two different types of rule bases by considering the (support-minimum support, minimum support) and (support, minimum support), i.e., interval and case-based. To test our proposal, we used the web log dataset of the Department of Computer at the University of Calgary to analyze sequential access patterns of students during February and March carried out in the campus by taking the midterm dates into account. The results reported in this paper are promising; they demonstrate the applicability and effectiveness of the proposed approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".