Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deux cartes portulans du XVIIe siècle, provenant des collections du Musée national de la Marine à Paris, ont été étudiées et restaurées au département des restaurateurs de l’Institut National du Patrimoine (Inp). Ces cartes de navigation appartenaient à l’origine à un atlas attribué à l’atelier marseillais du cartographe François Ollive. Chaque carte est peinte sur une pièce de parchemin et collée en plein sur des cartons. La réaction à l’humidité différente de ces deux matériaux était à l’origine de nombreuses dégradations sur les cartes, notamment une déformation concave très prononcée, des déchirures et des pertes de matière. Le parchemin, matériau fortement hygroscopique, nécessite des précautions particulières de montage et de conservation pour prévenir l’apparition de telles altérations. Un système de montage à l’aide de tirants en film polyester placés en périphérie de chaque carte, a été étudié et mis en œuvre pour ces deux pièces.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".