A Computational Approach for Identification of Epitopes in Dengue Virus Envelope Protein: A Step Towards Designing a Universal Dengue Vaccine Targeting Endemic Regions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A major problem in designing vaccine for the dengue virus has been the high antigenic variability in the envelope protein of different virus strains. In this study, a computational approach was adopted to identify a multi-epitope vaccine candidate against dengue virus that may be suitable for large populations in the dengue-endemic regions. Different bioinformatics tools were exploited that helped the identification of a conserved immunological hot-spot in the dengue envelope protein. The tools also rendered the prediction of immunogenicity and population coverage to the proposed 'in silico' vaccine candidate against dengue. A peptide region, spanning 19 amino acids, was identified in the envelope protein which found to be conserved in all four types of dengue viruses. Ten proteasomal cleavage sites were identified within the 19-mer conserved peptide sequence and a total of 8 overlapping putative cytotoxic T cell (CTL) epitopes were identified. The immunogenicity of these epitopes was evaluated in terms of their binding affinities to and dissociation half-time from respective human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules. The HLA allele frequencies were studied among populations in the dengue endemic regions and compared with respect to HLA restriction patterns of the overlapping epitopes. The cumulative population coverage for these epitopes as vaccine candidates was high ranging from approximately 80% to 92%. Structural analysis suggested that a 9-mer epitope fitted well into the peptide-binding groove of HLA-A*0201. In conclusion, the 19-mer epitope cluster was shown to have the potential for use as a vaccine candidate against dengue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".