La difficile articulation des temps sociaux : concilier la vie familiale et la vie professionnelle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le texte présente d’abord des données sur la diversification des formes d’emploi et les difficultés que cela implique pour la conciliation emploi-famille. Il expose ensuite les résultats d’une étude de cas dans le secteur policier, un secteur qui illustre bien la diversité des horaires de travail et les défis que cela pose pour les parents. Les extraits d’entrevue issus de l’étude de cas permettent de mieux comprendre le comportement des pères travailleurs en comparaison de celui des mères travailleuses du point de vue de la conciliation, les représentations et valeurs associées au rôle paternel et au rôle maternel, chez les individus, ainsi que les obstacles qui limitent, le cas échéant, la participation des pères aux mesures existantes et qui, de ce fait, ont une incidence sur l’insertion différenciée et l’incertitude subie par les hommes et les femmes sur le marché du travail
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".