MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1589986533

Patrons mauvais genre : femmes et entreprises à Tourcoing au XIXe siècle

2001· article· fr· W1589986533 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Béatrice Craig

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire sociale · 2001
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFamily economyHierarchyCapital (architecture)Capital citySociologyGender studiesSocioeconomicsEconomic growthPolitical scienceHistoryGeographyEconomicsLawAncient history
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tourcoing, a burgeoning industrial city in northern France, was a city of family businesses, big and small, in the nineteenth century. The families provided most of the capital and managerial skills. Women, as members of those families, could be directly involved. As long as gender signified a hierarchy, women could participate in economic life. Either women took over the economic activities men did not want to bother with, or they worked under the authority of men as agents or substitutes for incapacitated, absent, or dead males, or they worked for the benefit of the family. Middleclass married women involved in the economy assisted their husbands and succeeded them when they died. Independent female activities were much more common among skilled workers, whose wives kept stores and taverns or did custom dressmaking. While middle-class women’s participation in the economic life of the city may have declined in the first half of the century, it increased in the second.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.172
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistoire socialeSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207